CONTINUITY OF TEACHING METHODS FOR SOLVING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITY: THE CONTEXT OF THE INTEGRATIVE APPROACH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31110/2413-1571-2022-036-4-002

Keywords:

integrative approach, continuity of teaching mathematics, mathematical problem, information and communication technologies, enlargement of didactic units

Abstract

Formulation of the problem. The article has devoted the problem of the continuity of teaching methods for solving mathematical problems (on the example of equations with a parameter) using an integrative approach. The integrative approach in our research combines the integration of learning tools and the integration of learning methods. The purpose of the research is to determine the features of ensuring the continuity of teaching methods for solving mathematical problems at school and university, which takes place with an integrative approach.

Materials and methods. In the study, the analysis of mathematics curricula and educational programs of specialties with a significant mathematical component was carried out, and the search and analysis of relevant problems were followed by the construction of new research problems based on them. A generalization of my own and advanced pedagogical experience regarding the use of ICT in the educational process of schools and universities was also carried out. During work with pupils and students, the educational process was observed.

Results. In the example of a simple logarithmic equation with a parameter, the authors illustrated a complex integrative approach to the implementation of the continuity of teaching methods at schools and universities. This approach was implemented from the point of view of the integration of teaching methods - the method of addition, the technology of enlargement of didactic units, and the method of contrast. And also from the point of view of teaching aids - the use of graphic illustrations, information and communication technologies, schemes, and algorithms of analytical statements. In addition, the integrative approach was also implemented from the content point of view, since integrated images were used during the training - the image of the problem, the image of the problem series, and the image of the solution method.

Conclusions. As a result of the research, the authors came to the following conclusions: a) the idea of the technology of enlargement of didactic units in the form of solving problems in different ways, namely the combination in a specific case of analytical and graphical methods of solving equations with a parameter, contributes to better continuity of mathematics education. This approach ensures the actualization, generalization, and systematization of the abilities of pupils and students to implement knowledge and skills from the two most important content lines of the school mathematics course (the line of equations, inequalities and their systems, and the functional line);  b) the  combination  of  the  process of solving tasks with the process of compiling new consolidated exercises (for example, solving or compiling equations with a parameter using analytical statements or computer mathematics packages) gives practically unlimited opportunities for applying the research method in teaching mathematics at school and university. It also allows talking about the implementation of the didactic principle of continuity, aimed at providing opportunities for students to continue their study of mathematical disciplines at higher levels of education; c) the implementation of continuity of teaching mathematical disciplines involves the integration of related disciplines, the establishment of inter-subject connections. It is ensured by the internal integration of methods, means, components, and content lines of mathematics as an educational subject in schools and universities. Such integration is realized through the construction of integrated images. It is possible only with an in-depth study of specific mathematical problems and under the condition of using a heuristic approach to learning.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)

Birgin, O., & Uzun Yazıcı, K. (2021). The effect of GeoGebra software – supported mathematics instruction on eighth‐grade students' conceptual understanding and retention. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12532.

Botuzova, Yu. (2020). Factors of Providing the Continuity of Teaching Mathematics During Transition from High School to University. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 857-865. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080316.

Gogovska, V., & Malcheski, R. (2012). Improvement of Intra-disciplinary Integration of Mathematics Instruction. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5420–5424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.450.

Rizhniak, R., Pasichnyk, N., Krasnoshchok, I., Botuzova, Yu., & Akbash, K. (2020). Construction of Theoretical Model for Sustainable Development in Future Mathematical Teachers of Higher Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 2079-2089. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080546.

Rizhniak, R., Pasichnyk, N., Zavitrenko, D., Akbash, K., & Zavitrenko, A. (2021). The Implementation of an integrative Approach to Learning with use of integrated Images. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(1), https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.1/373.

Treacy, P., & O’Donoghue, J. (2013). Authentic Integration: a model for integrating mathematics and science in the classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.868543.

Bruner, J. (1977). Psihologija poznanija [Psychology of cognition]. Moscow: Progress. (in Russian).

Vozniuk, O.V. (2009). Tsilovi oriientyry rozvytku osobystosti u systemi osvity: intehratyvnyi pidkhid [Target orientations of personality development in the education system: an integrative approach]. Zhytomyr, Publishing House of Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University. (in Ukrainian).

Hladiuk, T., & Mishchuk, N. (1999). Pidhotovka maibutnikh uchyteliv do zdiisnennia intehratyvnoho pidkhodu v navchannia pryrodnychykh dystsyplin [Training future teachers for the implementation of an integrative approach to the teaching of natural sciences]. Pedahohika i psykholohiia profesiinoi osvity – Pedagogy and psychology of professional education, 3, 9-12. (in Ukrainian).

Ivanchuk, M.H. (2004). Intehrovane navchannia: sutnist ta vykhovnyi potentsial [Integrated learning: essence and educational potential]. Chernivtsi, Ruta. (in Ukrainian).

Ilchenko, V.R. (1994). Konstruiuvannia tsilisnosti zmistu osvity [Constructing the integrity of the content of education]. Postmetodyka – Postmethodology, 2, 2-5. (in Ukrainian).

Ilchenko, V.R. (1999). Osvitnia prohrama “Dovkillia”: Intehratsiia zmistu pryrodnychonaukovoi osvity: Kontsept. zasady [Curriculum "Environment": Integration for science education: Conceptual foundations]. APN Ukrainy, Instytut ped APN Ukrainy. K., Poltava. (in Ukrainian).

Kedrov, B.M. (1988). Nauki v ih vzaimosvjazi. Istorija. Teorija. Praktika [Sciences in their relationship. Story. Theory. Practice]. Moscow. (in Russian).

Klepko, S.F. (1998). Intehratyvna osvita i polimorfizm znannia [Integrative education and polymorphism of knowledge]. Kyiv-Poltava-Kharkiv, POIPOPP. (in Ukrainian).

Kozlovska, I.M. (1999). Filosofsko-metodolohichni aspekty intehratsii znan u zmisti suchasnoi osvity [Philosophical and methodological aspects of the integration of knowledge in the content of modern education]. Pedahohika i psykholohiia profesiinoi osvity – Pedagogy and psychology of professional education, 3, 56–61. (in Ukrainian).

Kozlovska, I.M. (2001). Teoretychni ta metodychni osnovy intehratsii znan uchniv profesiino-tekhnichnoi shkoly: avtoreferat dys. doktora ped. nauk [Theoretical and methodological foundations of the integration of knowledge of vocational school students: Abstract of the dissertation of the Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences]. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian).

Litvinenko, V.N., & Mordkovich, A.G. (1995). Praktikum po jelementarnoj matematike: Algebra. Trigonometrija: Uchebnoe posobie dlja studentov fiz.-mat. special'nostej ped. Institutov [Elementary mathematics workshop: Algebra. Trigonometry: A textbook for students of pedagogic institutes]. Moscow, ABF. (in Russian).

Moshtuk, V.V. (1991). Dydaktychni umovy intehratsii sporidnenykh navchalnykh predmetiv: Dys. kand. ped. nauk [Didactic conditions of integration of related educational subjects: Dissertation of Ph.D.]. Kyiv. (in Ukrainian).

Nichyshyna, V.V. (2008). Intehratyvnyi pidkhid do vyvchennia matematychnykh dystsyplin u protsesi pidhotovky maibutnikh vchyteliv matematyky: Avtoref. dys. kand. ped. nauk [An integrative approach to the study of mathematical disciplines in the process of training future teachers of mathematics: Abstract of the dissertation of Ph.D.]. Kirovohrad. (in Ukrainian).

Pasichnyk, N.O., & Rizhniak, R.Y. (2020). Rozviazuvannia matematychnykh zadach z realizatsiieiu polipredmetnykh (ekonomika, informatyka, matematyka) intehratyvnykh komponentiv [Solving of mathematical problems with the implementation of multipricultural (economics, informatics, mathematics) integrative components]. Fizyko-matematychna osvita – Physical and mathematical education, 2 (24), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.31110/2413-1571-2020-024-2-016. (in Ukrainian).

Rakov, S.A. (2005). Matematychna osvita: kompetentnisnyi pidkhid z vykorystanniam IKT [Mathematical education: a competency-based approach using ICT]. Kharkiv, Fakt. (in Ukrainian).

Semenov, I. (1999). Intehratsiia ta dyferentsiatsiia v nautsi ta profesiinii osviti [Integration and differentiation in science and professional education]. Pedahohika i psykholohiia profesiinoi osvity – Pedagogy and psychology of professional education, 3, 37-44. (in Ukrainian).

Skanavi, M.I. (1994). Zbirnyk zadach z matematyky dlia vstupnykiv do vtuziv [Collection of problems in mathematics for entrants to higher technical educational institutions]. Kyiv, Vyshcha shkola. (in Ukrainian).

Skafa, O., Tutova, O. (2009). Kompiuterno-oriientovani uroky v evrystychnomu navchanni matematyky: navchalno-metodychnyi posibnyk [Computer-oriented lessons in heuristic teaching of mathematics: a teaching and methodical guide]. Donetsk, Veber. (in Ukrainian).

Jerdniev, P.M. (1992). Ukrupnenie didakticheskih edinic kak tehnologija obuchenija [Enlargement of didactic units as a learning technology]. Moscow, Prosveshhenie. (in Russian).

Jerdniev, P.M., & Jerdniev, B.P. (1986). Ukrupnenie didakticheskih edinic v obuchenii matematike: kniga dlja uchitelja [Enlargement of didactic units in teaching mathematics: a book for the teacher]. Moscow, Prosveshhenie. (in Russian).

Published

12.09.2022

How to Cite

Botuzova , Y. ., Nichyshyna , V. ., & Rizhniak , R. . (2022). CONTINUITY OF TEACHING METHODS FOR SOLVING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITY: THE CONTEXT OF THE INTEGRATIVE APPROACH. Physical and Mathematical Education, 36(4), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.31110/2413-1571-2022-036-4-002