ON THE PHYSICAL AND MATHEMATICAL CORRECTNESS OF SOME EQUATIONS OF MECHANICS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31110/fmo2024.v39i1-07

Keywords:

dimensional analysis, wheel speed, normal acceleration, moments of force, moment of inertia, moment of cross-sectional resistance, angular momentum

Abstract

Formulation of the problem. In the mathematical description of some phenomena of classical and applied mechanics (after this referred to as mechanics), incomprehensible dimensional phenomena arise. For example, angular velocity can have two different units of measurement, normal acceleration - three, and such physical quantities as moment of force and mechanical work get the same unit newton-meter. From a scientific point of view, such phenomena are contradictions that should be eliminated. After all, Nature is one and uncontroversial; therefore, the description of its phenomena must also be uncontroversial. Each physical quantity (in this or that particular field) should have only one coherent unit, and each unit should characterize only one physical quantity. Therefore, the mathematical apparatus of mechanics needs improvement.

Materials and methods. One of the author's previous works established that incomprehensible dimensional phenomena result from the dimensional incorrectness of mathematical ratios due to their laxity. In particular, it was found that the well-known fundamental dependences of elementary geometry, which date back to Archimedes and have been considered impeccable analytical since time immemorial, are mathematically loose empirical and semi-empirical expressions. That prompts us to apply dimensional analysis to check the correctness of mechanics equations. This work also applied the basic principles of analytical mechanics and the law of energy conservation.

Results. A review of the nineteen mechanics equations showed that most need to be corrected - mathematically loose or inconsistent with the energy conservation law. The incorrect equations were brought to a mathematically rigorous form and reconciled with the energy conservation law. They lead to an unambiguous system of units of measurement for mechanics, which, in particular, includes five refined units. In this system of units, there are no cases where the exact quantity has different units or different quantities have the same unit.

Conclusions. It was established that the existing mathematical apparatus of classical and applied mechanics has significant shortcomings and can be improved.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Newell, D.B., & Tiesinga, E. (Eds.). (2019). The International System of Units (SI). NIST Special Publication 330 2019 edition. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.330-2019.

Leonard, B.P. (2021). Proposal for the dimensionally consistent treatment of angle and solid angle by the International System of Units (SI). Metrologia, 58, 052001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/abe0fc.

Mohr, P.J., & Phillips, W.D. (2015). Dimensionless units in the SI. Metrologia, 52(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/52/1/40.

Mohr, P.J., Shirley, E.I., Phillips, W.D., & Trott, M. (2022). On the dimension of angles and their units. Metrologia, 59(5), https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ac7bc2.

Quincey, P. (2016). Natural units in physics, and the curious case of the radian. Physics Education, 51(6), https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/51/6/065012.

Quincey, P., Mohr, P. J., & Phillips, W. D. (2019). Angles are in herently neizer length mration nor dimensionless. Metrologia, 56(4), 043001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ab27d7.

Quincey, P. (2021). Angles in the SI: a detailed proposal for solving the problem. Metrologia, 58, 053002. https://doi.org/10/1088/1681-7575/ac023f.

Voronkov, I.M. (1966). Kurs teoreticheskoy mekhaniki [Course of theoretical mechanics]. Nauka.

Kogan, I.Sh. (2011). Fizicheskaya velichina ne dolzhna imet' yedinitsu m-1 ili s-1 [A physical quantity should not have the unit m-1 or s-1]. Zakonodatel'naya i prikladnaya metrologiya – Legislative and applied metrology, 5, 43-49.

Mitrokhin, A.N. (2000). Matematika i yeyo rol' v analize razmernostey i obrazovanii yedinits izmereniy [Mathematics and its role in the analysis of dimensions and the formation of units of measurement]. Zakonodatel'naya i prikladnaya metrologiya – Legislative and applied metrology, 5, 39-47.

Petrov, V.A. (1986). Uzlovyye voprosy teorii kacheniya pnevmaticheskogo kolesa [Key issues in the theory of rolling of a pneumatic wheel]. Traktory i sel'khozmashiny – Tractors and agricultural machines, 8, 18 ̶22.

Petrushov, V.A. (1963). K voprosu o kachenii elastichnogo kolesa po tverdoy opornoy poverkhnosti [On the issue of rolling an elastic wheel on a solid supporting surface]. Avtomobil'naya promyshlennost' – Automotive industry, 12, 5 ̶9.

Pozhidayev, S.P. (2021a). O teorii kacheniya i pyatom kolese telegi [On the theory of rolling and the fifth wheel of the cart]. Avtomobil'naya promyshlennost' – Automotive industry, 6, 19-27.

Pozhidayev, S.P. (2021b). O teorii kacheniya i pyatom kolese telegi [On the theory of rolling and the fifth wheel of the cart]. Avtomobil'naya promyshlennost' – Automotive industry, 7, 21-26.

Pozhidayev, S.P. (2023). Radianna problema v SI – naukova mistyfikatsiya? [The radian problem in SI - a scientific hoax?]. Tekhnika i tekhnolohiyi APK – Techniques and technologies of agricultural industry, 3, 28-33. (in Ukrainian).

Huntley, G. (1970). Analiz razmernostey [Dimensional analysis]: Mir.

Shirokov, K.P. (1978). O statuse uglovykh yedinits [On the status of angular units]. Izmeritel'naya tekhnika – Measuring technology, 9, 30-33.

Published

28.02.2024

How to Cite

Pozhidayev, S. (2024). ON THE PHYSICAL AND MATHEMATICAL CORRECTNESS OF SOME EQUATIONS OF MECHANICS. Physical and Mathematical Education, 39(1), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.31110/fmo2024.v39i1-07