STUDY OF HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON CRITICAL THINKING PHENOMENON

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31110/fmo2024.v39i2-02

Keywords:

critical thinking, critical thinking skills, critical thinking components, questionnaire, monitoring, higher education students

Abstract

The article presents the results of the correspondence ideas analysis about the critical thinking phenomenon among the students of Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University (Ukraine) we interviewed with theoretical developments,
in particular, the classification of critical thinking skills identified by the American Philosophical Association (interpretation, analysis, evaluation, conclusion, explanation, and self-regulation) and the components of critical thinking identified
by Ukrainian scientist V. Nadurak (normative, discretionary and prescriptive components).

Formulation of the problem. The formation of students' critical thinking is a complex and multidirectional process, defined in the national Higher Education Standards as one of the main tasks of professional training for a competent specialist. Its implementation in pedagogical practice requires a clear understanding of the essence and content of the concept of "critical thinking," its structure and components, and considering the specifics of a particular educational environment, objective conditions, and circumstances in which the educational process occurs. However, many theoretical scientific approaches
to interpreting critical thinking nature make it difficult for teachers and students to define and understand it.

Materials and methods: theoretical (a systematic analysis method of theoretical scientific approaches and concepts presented in the works of Ukrainian and foreign scientists, which explain the phenomenon of critical thinking), empirical (surveys, questionnaires), and statistical data processing methods (we used Power BI Desktop for content analysis, Microsoft Excel, and IBM® SPSS® Statistics for statistical analysis).

Results. The study's results revealed peculiarities in the respondents' (TNTU, Ukraine) understanding of the critical thinking nature, including the definition of critical thinking as the ability to act quickly in extreme crises and a high percentage
of distrust of the opinions of others and the media. This specificity is primarily due to the stressful situations in which students have lived since the beginning of russia's military aggression against Ukraine. There needs to be more formation of the ability to cognitive explanation and self-regulation of respondents, namely skills necessary for the formation of critical thinking is recorded.

Conclusions. The article clarifies the meaning of the concept of "critical thinking" considering the peculiarities of its interpretation by students of TNTU, Ukraine. Ways to activate critical thinking skills in the educational process are outlined. They argue for the need to pay attention to the emotional well-being of students during the war and the use of methods and forms of education in the educational process aimed at increasing stress resistance and resilience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2021-2024). Zatverdzheni Standarty vyshchoi osvity [Higher Education Standards]. URL: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/osvita/visha-osvita/naukovo-metodichna-rada-ministerstva-osviti-i-nauki-ukrayini/zatverdzheni-standarti-vishoyi-osviti. (in Ukrainian).

Nadurak, V. (2022). Krytychne myslennia: poniattia ta praktyka [Critical thinking: concepts and practice]. Philosophy of Education, 28 (2), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2022-28-2-7. (in Ukrainian).

Tiahlo, O. (2017). Dosvid zasvoiennia krytychnoho myslennia v ukrainskii vyshchii shkoli [The experience of learning critical thinking in Ukrainian higher education]. Filosofiia osvity – Philosophy of Education, 2 (21), 240-257. (in Ukrainian).

Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4-10.

Black, M. (1946). Critical Thinking: An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. New York: Prentice-Hall.

Bloom, B. S., et al. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: David McKay Co Inc.

Altun, E., & Yildirim, N. (2023).What does critical thinking mean? Examination of pre-service teachers’ cognitive structures and definitions for critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101367.

Butler, H.A. (2012), Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment Predicts Real-World Outcomes of Critical Thinking. Appl. Cognit. Psychol., 26, 721-729. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2851.

Dewey, J. (2022). How we think? DigiCat.

Dong, M., Li, F., & Chang, H. (2023).Trends and hotspots in critical thinking research over the past two decades: Insights from a bibliometric analysis. Heliyon, 9(6), 16934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16934.

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004.

Facione, P. A., & The California Academic Press (1998). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction URL: https://evolkov.net/critic.think/basics/delphi.report.html#gsc.tab=0/.

Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455.

Herrero-Diz, P., Conde-Jiménez, J., & Reyes de Cózar, S. (2020). Teens’ Motivations to Spread Fake News on WhatsApp. Social Media + Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120942879.

Marin, L. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2011). Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicit instruction produces greatest gains. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08.002.

Meshko, H.M., Meshko, O.І., & Habrusieva N.V. (2023). The Impact of the War in Ukraine on the Emotional well-being of Students in the Learning Process. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 11(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2023.11.01.7.

Paul, R., & Binker, A. J. A. (1990). Critical thinking: what every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Rohnert Park, Calif., Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique, Sonoma State University.

Rapp, D, & Salovich, N. (2018). Can’t We Just Disregard Fake News? The Consequences of Exposure to Inaccurate Information. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 232-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218785193.

Stupple, E., Pitchford, M., Ball, L., Hunt, T., & Steel, R. (2017). Slower is not always better: Response-time evidence clarifies the limited role of miserly information processing in the Cognitive Reflection Test. PLoS One, 12(11), e0186404. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186404.

Published

30.04.2024

How to Cite

HABRUSIEVA, N., & SHOSTAKIVSKA, N. (2024). STUDY OF HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON CRITICAL THINKING PHENOMENON. Physical and Mathematical Education, 39(2), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.31110/fmo2024.v39i2-02

Most read articles by the same author(s)