MODELS OF IMMERSIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31110/fmo2026.v41i1-04

Keywords:

immersive learning, immersive learning environment, learning organization model, general secondary education institution, academic lyceum, natural science and mathematics subjects

Abstract

The article discusses innovative models developed and implemented to organize learning in an immersive environment. The structure of such models and their advantages in the learning process are highlighted.

Formulation of the problem. The development of immersive technologies in education raises the question of designing a comprehensive model of an immersive educational environment that integrates pedagogical, psychological, technological, and developmental factors and meets the conditions of learning in general secondary education institutions. Currently, immersive learning models are fragmented, which complicates their systematic implementation.

Materials and methods. The study uses a set of theoretical methods: analysis, systematization, generalization of scientific and pedagogical literature, and structural-functional and comparative analysis of pedagogical models.

Results. Five models of immersive learning have been systematized and analyzed: cognitive-affective, research-based, evolutionary, flow state, and game-based learning based on artificial intelligence. Their main characteristics, advantages, and limitations have been identified. It has been established that existing models do not fully account for the specific nature of natural science and mathematics disciplines, as well as the educational needs of high school students. This necessitates further theoretical and practical justification of the integrative approach. 

Conclusion. The fragmented nature of the immersive learning models discussed underscores the need to develop a comprehensive model that ensures pedagogical expediency, technological flexibility, and the relevance of learning content in academic lyceums. Further research will focus on creating and testing such a model in the context of studying natural and mathematical disciplines using virtual and augmented reality tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhattacharjee, D., Paul, A., Kim, J. H., & Kumar, K. (2018). An immersive learning model using evolutionary learning. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 65, 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.08.023

Capecchi, I., Borghini, T., Bellotti, M., & Bernetti, I. (2025). Enhancing education outcomes integrating augmented reality and artificial intelligence for education in nutrition and food sustainability. Sustainability, 17(5), 2113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052113

Conrad, M., Kablitz, D., & Schumann, S. (2024). Learning effectiveness of immersive virtual reality in education and training: A systematic review of findings. Computers & Education: X Reality, 4, 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100053

Fokides, E., & Antonopoulos, P. (2024). Development and testing of a model for explaining learning and learning-related factors in immersive virtual reality. Computers & Education: X Reality, 4, 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100048

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2011). Learning through gesture. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(6), 595–607. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.132

Groff, J. S. (2018). The potentials of game-based environments for integrated, immersive learning data. European Journal of Education, 53(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12270

Li, K.-C., Chen, C.-T., Cheng, S.-Y., & Tsai, C.-W. (2016). The design of immersive English learning environment using augmented reality. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 2076–2083. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040919

Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The Cognitive Affective Model of Immersive Learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2

McGowin, G., Fiore, S. M., & Oden, K. (2023). Towards a theory of learning in immersive virtual reality: Designing learning affordances with embodied, enactive, embedded, and extended cognition. In Bridging the XR Technology-to-Practice-Gap: Methods and Strategies for Blending Extended Realities into Classroom Instruction (Vol. I, pp. 35–54). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40.

Oyelere, S., Bouali, N., Kaliisa, R., Obaido, G., Yunusa, A., & Jimoh, E. (2020). Exploring the trends of educational virtual reality games: A systematic review of empirical studies. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00142-7

Peña-Acuña, B., & Rubio-Alcalá, F. D. (2024). Ethical approach to the use of immersive technologies. Advance about digitalisation of multilingual programs in the EHEA. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 5, 1357595. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1357595

Pinchuk, O. P., Tkachenko, V. A., & Burov, O. Yu. (2019). AV and VR as gamification of cognitive tasks. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference ICTERI (Vol. 2387, pp. 437–442). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2387/20190437.pdf

Pitsikalis, S., Lasica, I.-E., Kostas, A., & Vitsilaki, Ch. (2024). Educational design guidelines for teaching with immersive technologies – Updating learning outcomes of the European qualification framework. Trends in Higher Education, 3(4), 1091–1108. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3040064

Song, Y., Wu, K., & Ding, J. (2024). Developing an immersive game-based learning platform with generative artificial intelligence and virtual reality technologies – “Learningverse VR”. Computers & Education: X Reality, 4, 100069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100069

Published

02.03.2026

How to Cite

Rashevska, N. (2026). MODELS OF IMMERSIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS. Physical and Mathematical Education, 41(1), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.31110/fmo2026.v41i1-04

Most read articles by the same author(s)