DIGITAL TOOLS IN A MULTILINGUAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT: RATIONALE FOR AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO THE TRAINING OF A MODERN PROFESSIONAL

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31110/fmo2026.v41i3-03

Keywords:

digital tools, multilingual educational environment, multilingual approach, digital competence, plurilingual competence, professional training, generative artificial intelligence, intercultural communication

Abstract

Problem statement. The professional training of modern specialists increasingly takes place in digitally mediated, multilingual, and intercultural environments. Specialists work with digital sources, cloud services, collaborative platforms, machine translation systems, generative artificial intelligence, and multimodal content. At the same time, digitalization and multilingualism in higher education often develop in parallel rather than in an integrated way: digital courses tend to focus on technological operations, whereas language training is frequently separated from professional tasks. This creates a need to justify an integrated approach in which digital tools and multilingual practices are considered interdependent foundations of professional training.

Materials and methods. The study is theoretical and analytical. It employs the analysis of scholarly and policy-related sources, comparison of approaches to digital and plurilingual competences, categorization of digital tools, conceptual synthesis, and pedagogical modeling.

Results. The article clarifies the concept of a multilingual educational environment as a system of resources, interactions, and activities in which several languages are functionally used for cognition, professional communication, mediation, collaboration, and the creation of a digital product. The functions of digital tools in such an environment are systematized as information-search, communication-collaboration, translation-mediation, productive-creative, adaptive-support, analytical-assessment, and reflective-ethical functions. The study proposes a matrix for the use of digital tools, linking groups of tools with multilingual practices, professional tasks, and learning outcomes. The duality of digitalization and multilingualism is substantiated as a functional interdependence of a digital tool, multilingual activity, a professional task, and reflective verification of the result. The article also identifies pedagogical conditions for implementing the integrated approach: professionally oriented multilingual tasks, functional use of learners’ linguistic repertoires, alignment of digital tools with learning outcomes, critical use of machine translation and generative AI, intercultural interaction, multimodality, accessibility, reflective assessment, teacher readiness, and institutional support.

Conclusions. The integrated digital-multilingual approach is shown to develop not a set of isolated skills, but the ability to act in a complex professional environment in a responsible, linguistically flexible, and technologically grounded way. The study also outlines risks related to digital and linguistic inequality, automation, authorship, confidentiality, assessment validity, and institutional sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Council of Europe. (2020). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment—Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing. https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4

European Commission, Joint Research Centre. (2025). DigComp 3.0: The digital competence framework for citizens. https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/projects-and-activities/education-and-training/digital-transformation-education/digital-competence-framework-digcomp/digcomp-30_en

European Commission. (2020). Digital education action plan 2021–2027: Resetting education and training for the digital age. Publications Office of the European Union. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/action-plan

Gupta, V., Pal Chowdhury, S., Zouhar, V., Rooein, D., & Sachan, M. (2025). Are large language models for education reliable for all languages? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.17720

Hauck, M. (2023). From virtual exchange to critical virtual exchange: Promoting inclusion and social justice. Global Impact Exchange, Spring 2023, 9–12. https://oro.open.ac.uk/95015/

Lee, J., Hicke, Y., Yu, R., Brooks, C., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2024). The life cycle of large language models in education: A framework for understanding sources of bias. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55, 1982–2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13505

Li, W. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039

Melo-Pfeifer, S., & Ollivier, C. (2025). Assessing the plurilingual competence and plurilingual individuals’ skills and knowledge: Similarities and divergences. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1498940. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1498940

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693

O’Dowd, R. (2018). From telecollaboration to virtual exchange: State-of-the-art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 1, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.1

O’Dowd, R. (2021). Virtual exchange: Moving forward into the next decade. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1902201

O’Dowd, R. (2023). Internationalising higher education and the role of virtual exchange. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315393704

Piccardo, E. (2017). Plurilingualism as a catalyst for creativity in superdiverse societies: A systemic analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02169

Piccardo, E., & North, B. (2019). The action-oriented approach: A dynamic vision of language education. Multilingual Matters.

Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens—With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376

Zhao, Y., Pinto Llorente, A. M., & Sánchez Gómez, M. C. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 168, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212

Rudenko, Y., Ahadzhanov-Honsales, K., Ahadzhanova, S., Batalova, A., Diemientiev, Y., & Semenikhina, O. (2024). Interactive boards as digital tools in the modern educational process. In 2024 47th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO) (pp. 329–333). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIPRO60963.2024.10569393

Semenikhina, O. (2025). Moral, ethical, and academic culture of future teachers under the war in Ukraine and digital transformation: An analytical review through the lens of citizenship education. In O. Semenikhina (Ed.), Education at the edge: Resilience, recovery, and innovation in wartime Ukraine (pp. 75–114). Open Science Initiative. https://doi.org/10.31110/EduEdge-1.4

Yurchenko, A., Rozumenko, A., Rozumenko, A., Momot, R., & Semenikhina, O. (2023a). Cloud technologies in education: The bibliographic review. Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska, 13(4), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.35784/iapgos.4421

Yurchenko, A., Mulesa, P., & Semenikhina, O. (2023b). Individual educational trajectory building as a successful teacher skill in the digital age. Pedagogy and Education Management Review, 2, 64–72. https://doi.org/10.36690/2733-2039-2023-2-64-72

Published

30.06.2026

How to Cite

Смужаниця, Д. (2026). DIGITAL TOOLS IN A MULTILINGUAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT: RATIONALE FOR AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO THE TRAINING OF A MODERN PROFESSIONAL. Physical and Mathematical Education, 41(3), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.31110/fmo2026.v41i3-03