GRANT WRITING SKILLS IN THE STRUCTURE OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF FUTURE STEM EDUCATION SPECIALISTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31110/fmo2026.v41i3-01Keywords:
grant writing, STEM education, professional competence, master’s student, doctoral student, academic writing, project activity, digital competenceAbstract
Problem statement. The development of STEM education requires specialists who cannot only organize learning in line with interdisciplinary principles but also initiate educational and research projects, substantiate their relevance, attract resources, and responsibly present expected outcomes. In the training of master’s and doctoral students in the field of education, these skills are often regarded as additional, although they actually determine the future specialist’s ability to act in the conditions of project-based, competitive, and international academic activity. Therefore, there is a need to provide a theoretical justification for grant writing as a component of the professional competence of future STEM education specialists.
Materials and methods. The study is theoretical and analytical. The materials included scholarly works on the professional competence of STEM educators, technological pedagogical content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, professional development, academic writing, research self-efficacy, mentoring, coaching, and grant proposal preparation. The methods of analysis, synthesis, comparison, source content grouping, generalization, and conceptual modeling were used.
Results. The article shows that grant writing cannot be reduced to either the technique of writing a proposal or a means of obtaining funding. It integrates research thinking, the design of educational innovation, evidence-based work, communication with diverse stakeholders, resource planning, risk assessment, digital literacy, and ethical responsibility. The expediency of considering grant writing competence as a special professional competence of a future STEM education specialist is substantiated. Its structure is proposed and includes analytical and research, project-design, communicative and argumentative, financial and organizational, digital, and ethical-reflective components.
Conclusions. Grant writing competence is in demand among master’s and doctoral students in the field of education because it ensures the transition from an educational or research idea to its project-based formulation, resource support, and practical implementation. Its development should be incorporated into the professional training of STEM education specialists through specialized modules, mentoring, analysis of real grant proposals, step-by-step project design, and reflective assessment.
Downloads
References
Baker, V. L. (2025). Academic and grant-writing skill development on the path to professoriate: Recommendations for doctoral students and early-career academics. Journal of Research in Higher Education, 4(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu4010014
Chang, C.-F., Annisa, N., & Chen, K.-Z. (2024). Pre-service teacher professional education program (PPG) and Indonesian science teachers’ TPACK development: A career-path comparative study. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 8689–8711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13160-6
Cunningham, K. (2020). Beyond boundaries: Developing grant writing skills across higher education institutions. Journal of Research Administration, 51(2), 70-93. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1293015.pdf
Daniel, K., Msambwa, M. M., & Wen, Z. (2025). Can generative AI revolutionise academic skills development in higher education? A systematic literature review. European Journal of Education, 60, e70036. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70036
Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2024). Utilising artificial intelligence-enhanced writing mediation to develop academic writing skills in EFL learners: A qualitative study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 39(1–2), 263–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2374772
Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. (2025). Integrating learning theories and innovative pedagogies in STEM education: A comprehensive review. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 5(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/16538
Joseph, O. B., & Uzondu, N. C. (2024). Professional development for STEM educators: Enhancing teaching effectiveness through continuous learning. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(8), 1370. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i8.1370
Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Katzis, K., & Paparistodemou, E. (2024). Sustaining teacher professional learning in STEM. Education Sciences, 14(4), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040402
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Pentang, J., & Domingo, J. G. (2024). Research self-efficacy and productivity of select faculty members: Inferences for faculty development plan. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(4), 1693-1706. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.4.1693
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Shykhnenko, K. (2024). Building research capacity and promoting collaboration through grant writing: Lessons from Ukrainian universities. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(3), 1261-1274. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1261
Stavermann, K. (2024). Online teacher professional development: A research synthesis on effectiveness and evaluation. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30, 203–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09792-9
Weber-Main, A. M., McGee, R., Eide Boman, K., Hemming, J., Hall, M., Unold, T., & others. (2022). Variations of a group coaching intervention to support early-career biomedical researchers in grant proposal development: A pragmatic, four-arm, group-randomized trial. BMC Medical Education, 22, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03093-w
Wong, J. T., Bui, N. N., Fields, D. T., & Hughes, B. S. (2022). A learning experience design approach to online professional development for teaching science through the arts: Evaluation of teacher content knowledge, self-efficacy and STEAM perceptions. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(6), 609-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2112552
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Микола Каплієнко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)that allows others freely to use (read, copy and print) submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.

