THINKING TACTIC OF PROFESSIONAL LANGUAGE TERMINOLOGY ACQUISITION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31110/2413-1571-2022-034-2-004Keywords:
understanding, sense of a term, semantic content of a term, structuring, a notion, operating with a notionAbstract
Formulation of the problem. The basis of the proposed development is the results of the logical analysis of language as a sign system as well as the results of analysis operations with concepts as a system of thinking procedures. According to our observations, there are many students who face difficulties in understanding the research definitions. As it is impossible to teach understanding, we wondered about what thinking tactics provide conscious learning of terms?
Materials and methods. The basis of the proposed development is the result of the logical analysis of language as a sign system. The idea of performing over the notion of analytical and synthetic logical operations based on both types of hierarchical relations between notions — "genus/species" and "whole/part", arises from the general morphological analysis of F. Zwicky
Results. It has been found that the term as a linguistic sign has three main attributes: meaning of the object, sense, and semantic content. The sense of the term is fixed by the definition, and the semantic content is attributed to it by the characteristic — cognitive technique like the definition. Semantic content, in contrast to the sense of the term, is a set of unstructured information. The thinking tactics in question are aimed at developing the subject's ability to learn to understand the sense of a term by giving a structural organization to its semantic content. It is proposed to structure the semantic content of the term by solving two specific tasks. Inference of terms — keywords of the structure sought — is the essence of the first task. Reproduction of the structure of the semantic content of the learned term constitutes the second task. The mental tactics are the embodiment of the pedagogical technique described in the logical theory of the concept: cognitive techniques that are like the definition must precede it because their application often facilitates the understanding and assimilation of the definition of the term.
Conclusion. The proposed mental tactics of learning the term will be effective if the subject of learning: 1) is able to establish and define hierarchical connections between concepts; 2) knows the nature, structure, and rules of execution of the concept of logical operations: generalization, taxonomic and mereological divisions, mereological integration; 3) has regulatory procedures that are the components of these operations; 4) has the means to control the correctness, compliance operations, and derived terms.
Downloads
References
REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)
Akhmetbekova, A. (2014). The problem of terminographic semantization in education. Procedia — Social and Behavioural (pp. 2976-2979), Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.691.
Bain, J., Ballantyne R., Mills, C., & Lester, N. (2002). Reflecting on practice: Student teachers’ perspectives. Post Pressed.
Birk, А (2011). What Is Robotics? An Interdisciplinary Field Is Getting Even More Diverse. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 18(4), 94-95. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6096015.
Courant, R., & Robbins, H. (1996). What is Mathematics? An elementary approach to ideas and methods. Oxford University Press.
International Organization for Standardization (2009). Terminology work — Principles and methods (ISO 704:2009).
International Organization for Standardization (2021). Robotics — Vocabulary (ISO 8373:2021).
MSC2020 — Mathematics Subject Classification (2020). AMC — American Mathematical Society. https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet/msc/msc2020.html.
Ritchey, T. (2013). General Morphological Analysis. A general method for non-quantified modelling. Swedish Morphological Society. https://www.swemorph.com/pdf/gma.pdf.
Bogin, G. (2001). Obretenie sposobnosti ponimat': Vvedenie v germenevtiku [Gaining the ability to understand: Introduction to Hermeneutics]. Psihologija i biznes onlajn – Psychology and Business online. https://www.klex.ru/2s6. (in Russian).
Brjushinkin, V. (2001). Logika [Logic]. Gardariki. (in Russian).
Vojshvillo E., & Degtjarev M. (2001). Logika (Logic). VLADOS-PRESS (in Russian).
Gorbatov, V. (2005). Logika. Uchebno-metodicheskij kompleks. [Logic. Educational and methodical complex]. Izdatel'skij centr EAOI. (in Russian).
Zotova, V. (1998). Semantyzatsiia termina u navchalnomu teksti ta slovnyku (na prykladi terminolohii robototekhniky) [Semantics of the term in the educational text and dictionary (on the example of robotics terminology)]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Dnipropetrovsk State University. https://cheloveknauka.com/v/508391/a?#?page=1. (in Ukrainian).
Ivlev, Ju. (1996). Logika dlja juristov [Logic for lawyers ]. MGU. (in Russian).
Sirotkina-Primak, L. (2011). Logiko-kognitivnye struktury operacij s ponjatijami [Logical-cognitive structures of operations with concepts]. Candidate’s thesis. Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. https://cheloveknauka.com/logiko-kognitivnye-struktury-operatsiy-s-ponyatiyami. (in Russian).
Titov, V. (2003). Sistemno-morfologicheskij podhod v tehnike, nauke, social'noj sfere [System-morphological approach in technology, science, social sphere]. Metodolog. https://www.metodolog.ru/00039/00039.html. (in Russian).
Shelov, S. (2018). Ocherk teorii terminologii: sostav, ponjatijnaja organizacija, prakticheskie prilozhenija [Essay on the theory of terminology: composition, conceptual organization, practical applications]. PrintPro. (in Russian).
FES — Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk [Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary] (2002). Abrys. (in Ukrainian).
Yurkevych, O. (2021). Taksonomiia chastyn ta yii lohichni pryntsypy v mereolohii [Taxonomy of parts and its logical principles in mereology]. Visnyk NIuU im. Ya. Mudroho. Seriia: filosofiia, filosofiia prava, politolohiia, sotsiolohiia – The Bulletin of Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. Series:Philosophy, Philosophies of Law, Political Science, Sociology, 2(49), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.21564/2663-5704.49.229767. (in Ukrainian).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Таяна Дєордіца, Марина Вороніна, Ольга Єпіфанова, Володимир Толмачов

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)that allows others freely to use (read, copy and print) submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.

