FOUR PROMPTING TECHNIQUES FOR ANALYTICAL WORK WITH TEACHING AND LEARNING RESOURCES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31110/fmo2026.v41i2-04

Keywords:

large language models, prompting techniques, instructional materials, Deming cycle (PDCA), Role Prompting, Plan and-Solve, Chain-of-Verification, Self-Refine

Abstract

Formulation of the problem. Teachers are increasingly using large language models (LLMs) to enhance their teaching and learning resources (TLRs). However, most of them have no formal training in artificial intelligence and therefore rely on unsystematic approaches. The prompting techniques described in research literature can activate specific capabilities of LLMs, making interactions more predictable and manageable. Yet most existing taxonomies classify these techniques according to the model’s internal logic, whereas a teacher’s work is typically organized around the type of textual task being addressed. This highlights the need for a more purposeful selection of prompting techniques that support analytical work with teaching and learning resources (TLRs).

Materials and methods. The research was conducted as an exploratory study, leading to the development of a practical toolkit for teachers. The study proceeded through three stages: a theoretical analysis and synthesis of the relevant literature, the development of a procedure for selecting appropriate prompting techniques, and pilot testing. The selection was based on the taxonomy by Schulhoff et al. (2025), which includes 58 textual prompting techniques.

Results. The study produced a practical toolkit featuring four prompting techniques: Role Prompting, Plan-and-Solve, Chain-of-Verification, and Self-Refine, organized according to the logic of the Deming cycle (Plan → Do → Check → Act). The toolkit is implemented through standardized prompt templates adapted to four dimensions of analytical work with TLRs: content, structural and logical organization, language and style, and evaluation. It can be used in two ways: a procedural mode, in which all four techniques are applied sequentially, and an autonomous mode, in which a teacher selects a single technique based on the specific task at hand. 

Conclusion. The four selected techniques transform interaction with LLMs into a clear and well-defined set of steps. They provide teachers with a structured approach to analytical work with TLRs, regardless of their level of technical expertise. At the same time, any results generated by the model should always be critically evaluated by the user.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alenezi, M., Wardat, S., & Akour, M. (2024). The need of integrating digital education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1392091. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1392091

Clarke, A. C. (1973). Profiles of the Future: An Inquiry into the Limits of the Possible (Rev. ed.). Harper & Row.

Deng, M., Wang, J., Hsieh, C.-P., Wang, Y., Guo, H., Shu, T., Song, M., Xing, E. P., & Hu, Z. (2022). RLPrompt: Optimizing discrete text prompts with reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 3369–3391. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.222

Dhuliawala, S., Komeili, M., Xu, J., Raileanu, R., Li, X., Celikyilmaz, A., & Weston, J. (2023). Chain-of-verification reduces hallucination in large language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.11495

Eager, B., & Brunton, R. (2023). Prompting higher education towards AI-augmented teaching and learning practice. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 20(5), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.5.02

Kojima, T., Gu, S. S., Reid, M., Matsuo, Y., & Iwasawa, Y. (2022). Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 35, pp. 22199–22213). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/8bb0d291acd4acf06ef112099c16f326-Paper-Conference.pdf

Liu, Y.-Y., Zheng, Z., Zhang, F., Feng, J.-C., Fu, Y., Zhai, J., He, B., Zhang, Y., & Du, X. (2025). A comprehensive taxonomy of prompt engineering techniques for large language models. Frontiers of Computer Science, 19(6), Article 196904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-025-50058-z

Madaan, A., Tandon, N., Gupta, P., Hallinan, S., Gao, L., Wiegreffe, S., Alon, U., Dziri, N., Prabhumoye, S., Yang, Y., Welleck, S., Majumder, B. P., Gupta, S., Yazdanbakhsh, A., & Clark, P. (2023). Self-refine: Iterative refinement with self-feedback. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 36). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17651

Qian, Y. (2025). Pedagogical applications of generative AI in higher education: A systematic review of the field. TechTrends, 69(5), 1105–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01100-1

Sahoo, P., Singh, A. K., Saha, S., Jain, V., Mondal, S., & Chadha, A. (2024). A systematic survey of prompt engineering in large language models: Techniques and applications. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.07927

Schulhoff, S., Ilie, M., Balepur, N., Kahadze, K., Liu, A., Si, C., Li, Y., Gupta, A., Han, S. I., Schulhoff, S., Hao, Y., Seifermann, M., & Schwartz, P. (2025, v6). The prompt report: A systematic survey of prompting techniques. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.06608

Shanahan, M., McDonell, K., & Reynolds, L. (2023). Role play with large language models. Nature, 623(7987), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06647-8

Wang, L., Xu, W., Lan, Y., Hu, Z., Lan, Y., Lee, R. K.-W., & Lim, E.-P. (2023). Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 2609–2634). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.04091

Yan, L., Sha, L., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Chen, G., Li, X., Jin, Y., & Gašević, D. (2024). Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13370

Published

30.04.2026

How to Cite

Dieorditsa, T., Voronina, M., Hladushyna, R., Yepifanova, O., Kozmenko, O., & Tolmachov, V. (2026). FOUR PROMPTING TECHNIQUES FOR ANALYTICAL WORK WITH TEACHING AND LEARNING RESOURCES. Physical and Mathematical Education, 41(2), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.31110/fmo2026.v41i2-04

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>